[Posted Mar 31,
2007]
Deductive Knowledge Superior to Inductive
|
![]() Inductive reason: Making it up as you go |
Svarup Damodar: One of our godbrothers
asked why the inductive knowledge is so successful, especially to
scientists?
Prabhupada: Inductive
knowledge always unsuccessful.
Svarup Damodar: But science
finds out these laws and so many things. So to some extent it's working.
Prabhupada: No, they can
extend... Just like inductive knowledge is like this: you study man.
You see, first man dies, second man dies, third man dies. In this way,
you can go to hundred or thousand man. But I can say that "You might
not have seen that man who does not die." I can challenge that. You
cannot say... Simply by studying hundred thousand man, you cannot say
that all men die. I can challenge that "You have not seen the...,
beyond that. So how you can conclude like that?" There may be somebody.
As you say, "May be," we can say, "may be somebody who does not die."
[laughter] What is the answer?
Svarup Damodar: That argument
is different though from the way the science does. For example, they
work so hard...
Prabhupada: The science
does... They conclude something, and next man changes. So that is your
science. So how you can make a conclusion?
Svarup Damodar: But how so
many things are working under the laws...?
Prabhupada: Working, that's
all right. You have seen that so many people are dying. That's all
right. But I am challenging that you have not seen the next man who
does not die. That you cannot answer.
Svarup Damodar: For example,
they find the laws of motion, Newton's laws of motion. They utilize
that concept in shooting rockets. And they use exactly some
mathematical formula and apply it.
Prabhupada: That's all right,
but sometimes the shooting of the rocket missing.
Svarup Damodar: No, what we
are saying is that the law that they find out by their own effort is
working...
Prabhupada: So you effort is
limited. How you can conclude?
Svarup Damodar: So inductive
knowledge is true to a certain limit.
Prabhupada: Certain extent,
that's all. It is not conclusion.
Svarup Damodar: But to a
devotee, though, there is nothing like inductive knowledge because
knowledge gives by Krishna. So it must be deductive.
Prabhupada: Deductive always.
And that is easier. Krishna says that "I come as death and take away
everything." So we know that nobody can be immortal; everyone must die.
Simple conclusion.
Brahmananda: We don't have to
test it because Krishna says it.
Prabhupada: Yes. You take
that...
Ravindra-svarup: We could
never know ourselves unless we knew all cases.
Prabhupada: No, we do not
require to know. We hear from Krishna, the Supreme Person. That is
perfect.
Devotee: That's our logic.
You said that once.
Prabhupada: Yes, that is our
logic.
Gurudas: But also you said
once that we feel it. That is our proof.
Prabhupada: No, feel, you may
wrongly feel because you are imperfect. That is not good argument. Our
argument is that the message is coming from the most authorized
personality; therefore it is perfect. And we receive guru-parampara
[knowledge descending through disciplic
succession]. That is our process. Evam parampara-praptam
imam rajarshayo viduh [Bhagavad-gita 4.2]. The rajarshis,
means very, very, big, big, stalwart persons, they accept it. Just like
Arjuna gives evidence that "I accept You. You are Parabrahma."
So he, next line, he says, "It is not that I am saying. But big, big
personalities like Vyasadeva, he has said. Narada has said. Asita has
said. And You are personally saying, so I have no doubt." This is our
process. Deductive knowledge is always imperfect.
Svarup Damodar: What about jñana-yogis?
Prabhupada: Jñana-yogis,
they are also imperfect.
Svarup Damodar: Their
knowledge is speculative.
Prabhupada: Yes. Anyone who
is speculative on the strength of his own knowledge is imperfect.
Because we are imperfect, speculation is imperfect.
Ravindra-svarup: The same
criticism that you made of induction was also made by John Stuart Mill
and Bertrand Russell, but they became skeptics. They said, "Therefore
there's no knowledge at all."
Prabhupada: That is another
nonsense. That is also speculation. (laughter) "Because I have failed,
therefore there is no knowledge." This is also imperfect because how I
can conclude like that? I am imperfect. I cannot decide this way or
that way. So that is also. Vedic knowledge says that a conditioned soul
has got four defects: illusion, mistake, imperfectness and cheating.
Any conditioned soul. Even Brahma, he is receiving knowledge from
Krishna. Tene brahma hrida ya adi-kavaye [Srimad-Bhagavatam
1.1.1]. Adi-kavi means Brahma. He is the most perfect person
within this universe, Lord Brahma. So he is also receiving knowledge
from Krishna. Any conditioned soul, beginning from Brahma down to the
ant, they are defective in four ways: illusion, mistake, imperfectness
and cheating. They know that "I am imperfect." Just this Darwin. He
knew that he is imperfect, and he cheated so many persons—by false
theory, which he cannot explain. He simply gives, "Perhaps millions of
years' gap...," this, that. That is not knowledge. So the imperfect
person is prone to become a cheater. So we should not take knowledge
from the cheaters. What do you think?
Svarup Damodar: We should
take knowledge from Krishna.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Svarup Damodar: And
Prabhupada.
Prabhupada: Yes. Prabhupada
is giving you the same knowledge, that's all. There is no question of
cheating. I have received this knowledge from Krishna, and you take
this. That's all. My business is finished.
Kirtanananda: Things equal to
the same thing are equal to each other.
Prabhupada: Yes, that is the
duty. Parampara system means the spiritual master shall not
give anything which is not spoken by Krishna. That is Chaitanya
Mahaprabhu's order: Yare dekha, tare kaha 'krishna'-upadesha:
"You become guru under My order." "But I do not know anything
nicely, how can I become guru?" "No, you have no botheration.
You simply take Krishna's word and say, and you become guru."
amara ajñaya guru haña tara ei desha
yare dekha, tare kaha 'krishna'-upadesha [Chaitanya- charitamrita Madhya 7.128]
If
the child says to another man, "Father said, 'This is this,' " then he
is perfect. He has learned from the father, and the father is perfect,
then whatever he says, it is perfect. Why should he take so much
botheration? So our, process is that, that we become guru not
like that rascal Guruji, no. We speak whatever Krishna has spoken.
That's all. Of course, we try to impress upon you with your reason,
logic, but we shall speak the same thing, not anything else. Krishna
says, "I am supreme;" We say, "Krishna is supreme." That's all. Where
is the botheration? I haven't got to find out by my logic and induction
whether Krishna is supreme. That I have already done. So Krishna is
supreme. There is no doubt about it. Now, whatever Krishna says, it is
all right. That's all.
Svarup Damodar: That saves a
lot of time.
Prabhupada: Yes, that is
intelligence. That is intelligence. These, all these rascals, they are
unnecessarily wasting. Shrama eva hi kevalam. Simply they
are wasting time. That's all. That is stated in the Srimad-Bhagavatam,
dharmah svanushthitah pumsam
vishvaksena-kathasu yah
notpadayed ratim yadi
shrama eva hi kevalam [SB 1.2.8]
You
are executing your duties as scientist or as anything, but if you don't
have faith in the words of Vishvaksena, then you are simply wasting
your time.
Svarup Damodar: That's one of
the chapters in our book that Madhava is working, that inductive
knowledge, there is nothing like inductive knowledge. It's all maya;
it's illusion.
Prabhupada: Yes, it is
illusion. [break] ...western countries it is full of inductive
knowledge. That's all. [break][Speaks of Dr.
Radhakrishnan, well-known translator of Bhagavad-gita who
liked to give his own interpretations as to the meaning of the verses,
often contradicting the obvious intent:] Dr. Radhakrishnan used
to say, on sarva-dharman parityajya mam ekam... [Bg.
18.66: "Just surrender unto Me"], "It is too much." [laughter]
Svarup Damodar: He died just
a few months ago.
Prabhupada: Yes, he died, and
brain fag. All his knowledge, last five, six years—he could not
recognize his own men.
Gurudas: When we went to see
him, he hardly could speak.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Svarup Damodar: Because of
his inductive knowledge.
Prabhupada: That's all. He
became a victim of the western people. Because the Oxford University
was paying him very nicely, he became a servant of the western thought.
[break]
Svarup Damodar: ...in the
evolutionary cycle, the transmigration of the soul, we were inquiring
whether there's any specific details in the Vedas about
the step-b-step transmigration of the spirit, of the soul.
Prabhupada: Yes. From the
aquatics to the plants, and then insect, then bird, then beast, then
human being.
Svarup Damodar: Then it's the
same with the Darwin's Theory.
Prabhupada: Darwin has taken
from here, and he has tried to explain in a hodgepodge way so that he
may get the credit, that's all.