subscribe to the RSS Feed

Friday, September 3, 2010

Something rotten with Radhanath?

Posted by Hansadutta das on August 19, 2010

Radhanath bookRadhanath

The Journey Home: Autobiography of an American Swami by Radhannath Swami. Radhanath Swami recently has come out with a new book in the style of Autobiography of a Yogi, which Prabhupada criticized as vainglorious. So is Radhanath’s book in that same vain vein?

Meanwhile…

Someone sent me the link to this article about Radhanath by Hrishikesh das:

Radhanath Swami’s Alleged Involvement in Sulochan’s Murder

BY: HRISHIKESH DASA (HENRY DOKTORSKI)

Aug 16, 2010 — PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USA (SUN) — In his recent article, Dinanath Carana das asks why so many of Radhanath Swami’s programs are outside of ISKCON. I cannot claim to know Radhanath Swami’s mind, but as a former resident of New Vrindaban, I guess one factor might be his alleged knowledge of and involvement in Sulochan dasa’s brutal murder nearly 25 years ago. go to story

And the following email came close on its heels: More here… »

What happened to the BBT

Posted by Hansadutta das on August 1, 2010

My dearest Urdhvaga Prabhu,

Obeisances, all glories to Srila Prabhupada.

I owe it to Srila Prabhupada and to the devotees, to yourself, as having been appointed by Srila Prabhupada to act as trustee for life, to clarify what happened with the BBT. More here… »

Akruranath and Hansadutta on Facebook

Posted by Hansadutta das on July 30, 2010

An exchange between myself and Akruranath das over on Facebook. I addressed Akruranath:

You can read over the conversation that unfolded around the formation
of the “Oath of Allegiance to Prabhupada”, 1975

I am pasting in the relevant exchange for your convenient reading. The whole exchange between leading devotees and Srila Prabhupada can be seen at the link above.

RUPANUGA: It’s a legal document. This is a legal document.

ATREYA RSI: “And chanting sixteen rounds very seriously.”

MADHUDVISA: Daily.

ATREYA RSI: “Daily.”

MADHUDVISA: At least.

BRAHMANANDA: And free from the offenses.

HANSADUTTA: We have to take some…

JAYATIRTHA: Who’s chanting free from the offenses?

PRABHUPADA: No, no, don’t…

ATREYA RSI: “Very seriously” is all I can say.

PRABHUPADA: Yes, yes, do that.

ATREYA RSI: I cannot say “free of offenses.” Because…

PRABHUPADA: “Seriously” means without offense.

ATREYA RSI: …I am degraded. “Very seriously, or may be given to me
from time to time directly, these directions, by my aforesaid Guru
Maharaja, or through his books, or…” In other words, direction
given, instruction given, directly by him or through his…

PRABHUPADA: Better directly.

ATREYA RSI: No “His books”?

PRABHUPADA: No.

ATREYA RSI: Not necessary.

PRABHUPADA: Because I may give direction according to the time.

ATREYA RSI: “Or” means both.

PRABHUPADA: Hm?

ATREYA RSI: “Or” can mean… All right. “Or through his commissioners…”

PRABHUPADA: Direct, direct instruction is important. Just like
Krishna. In the books He has given many instructions, but then He
says, sarva-dharman parityaja. If one says that “You gave me
instruction before like this. How can I give up this?” so that is not
important. The direct instruction is important.

ATREYA RSI: “To me from time to time directly by my aforesaid Guru
Maharaja, or through his commissioner…”

PRABHUPADA: Yes.

ATREYA RSI: “Or through his authorized person or persons, and I shall
obey faithfully all such instructions and directions which shall be,
which shall be binding on me, and that I will uphold the sovereignty
and integrity of my Guru Maharaja, His Divine Grace A.C.
Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, and the managing body commission and,
or, any other body appointed by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta
Swami Prabhupada working under the said International Society for
Krishna Consciousness. And I shall faithfully discharge the duty upon
which I am about to enter or I have already appointed to that
effect.” Now this is an addition. “I further pledge that His Divine
Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami is the only source of authority,
represented by his instructions and books, and I shall follow his
instructions, I shall follow the instructions of the books…”

MADHUDVISA: Only these books.

ATREYA RSI: “Only these books” Rather than “I will not follow any other book.”

PRABHUPADA: No, why you’ll put? [laughs] This is…?

ATREYA RSI: It’s not…?

PRABHUPADA: This is required?

RUPANUGA: You mean the part about the books, Srila Prabhupada?

PRABHUPADA: Hm?

RUPANUGA: You mean the part about the books?

HANSADUTTA: It’s already said that you’re his direct instructions.

ATREYA RSI: This is to protect, like, if somebody chanting sixteen rounds…

HANSADUTTA: It’s redundant.

MADHUDVISA: Well, I thought if someone was chanting sixteen rounds
and following the principles and reading someone else’s books, like
Siddha-svarupa’s people…

HANSADUTTA: Yeah, but we’ve just already read one portion where it
says that we will follow direct instructions of Prabhupada.

PRABHUPADA: That’s it.

HANSADUTTA: So again he’s repeating it.

PRABHUPADA: Instruction, follow that.

ATREYA RSI: So then it’s not necessary about this “only” sort part of…

PRABHUPADA: Yes.

MADHUDVISA: What if there is no direct instruction?

PRABHUPADA: Yes. I don’t think that part is anymore important.”

The conclusion from this important conversation is: direct, verbal or otherwise, instructions are more important, relevant and take precedence over previous instructions. Like a doctor giving the patient a prescription for some medical condition, a military commander giving a new battle strategy, or Prabhupada giving a unique order for continuing the process of initiation. Srila Bhaktisddhanta Prabhupada writes in one essay “What are the scriptures? They are nothing but the words of the pure devotees.” If the acharya sets a precedent by making an arrangement that appears to be nontraditional, then so be it. Just as sometimes the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court makes a ruling, and it becomes a precedent in law. It becomes law. Since you are a lawyer, this should make sense to you. I am interested how you will understand this point. More here… »

How Ramanujacharya did it

Posted by Hansadutta das on July 22, 2010

Here’s an interesting read on successor gurus in the Ramanuja line:

Local Diksha: For When the Oil Runs Dry by Kripamoya das.

Sri Ramanujacarya chose 74 disciples to act as gurus after his death, one for each major holy place. Did he create ‘zonal acaryas?’ And if so, how did they avoid the corruption we have come to associate with such an idea?

Sri Ramanujacarya (1017-1137) created 74 simhasana-dhipatis or ‘throne-holders,’ to give initiation after his death, he created what we in ISKCON would term ‘zonal acaryas.’ He chose 74 of his disciples to give diksha, each of them affiliated to one of the many temples spread far and wide throughout a large tract of India. Those temples were not created by Sri Ramanujacarya but were ancient places made famous by his disciplic predecessors, the Alwars, who sung about the Deities within them in their four-thousand hymn Divya Prabandham. In many cases Ramanujacarya restored or regularised the worship of those Deities and safeguarded their worship in perpetuity by establishing systems of succession.

Skip down through the article and find what Kripamoya has to say about Prabhupada’s appointment of the eleven: More here… »