[Posted
February 5, 2007]
Getting
A Head in Life
His Divine Grace A.C.
Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

Data
from Dekaban, A.S. and Sadowsky, D., Changes in brain
weights during the span of human life: relation of brain weights to
body heights and body weights, Ann. Neurology, 4:345-356, 1978 |
Globe
& Mail
- February 3, 2007 - KAREN VON HAHN -
BRAIN CHIC
Surprise,
surprise, women's brain scans do show different responses to certain
stimuli than men's. In a German study, writes Dr. Luann Brizendrine in
the controversial bestseller The Female Brain, researchers scanned both
sexes while they mentally rotated abstract shapes.
"Women triggered brain pathways linked to visual identification and
spent more time than men picturing the objects in their minds. . . . It
took women longer to get to the same answer."
This, of course, is frighteningly similar to the observation on gender
and ability uttered by former Harvard president Lawrence Summers, which
without the politically neutralizing benefit of a supportive brain
scan, cost him his job. go
to
story
Size
Does Matter
TV
Interview, July 9, 1975, Chicago
|
The
Role of Women
|
Liberated
Woman: Out of Place A.C.
Bhaktivedanta Swami
Government
means a set of rascals. But practical point of view the woman wants
equal right. Equal rights they enjoy, and the woman becomes pregnant,
and he goes away, the boy. And she has to kill the child or beg from
the government. This is her freedom. And still, equal rights. Where
equal right? The boy has gone away. You also go away? No. You'll have
to carry the child. To get freedom you have to kill or you have to beg.
And still she thinks, "I am free." more |
Woman reporter: There is one question I
have for you. You say that a woman's brain is smaller than a man's.
Prabhupada: Woman?
Nitai: Woman's brain is
smaller than a man's brain.
Prabhupada: Yes, that is a
fact. In the history there is no woman who is a big philosopher, a big
mathematician, big scientist, big educationist. We don't find. They
were all men.
Woman reporter: What about
women who are leaders of countries such as your own country?
Prabhupada: Well, according
to Vedic conception woman is never offered leadership. But experience
has shown that woman's leadership has not been successful.
Woman reporter: Do you think
Mrs. Gandhi's leadership has not been successful?
Prabhupada: Well, there is
already trouble. There are many big, big men, they do not agree with
her and she has taken emergency steps. So on the whole, the country is
in trouble.
Woman reporter: What about
Mrs. Meir, president of Israel?
Prabhupada: I do not say of
any particular woman, but according to Vedic civilization, we have
never seen in the history that woman has become a leader.
Woman reporter: Women have
been leaders.
Prabhupada: They were not
selected. The leader—formerly it was monarchy—the monarchs were
selected by the advisory board of the first-class men. So they never
selected any woman to become the leader of the society.
Woman reporter: What about
women who are elected by the people?
Prabhupada: Well, people
election... Just like you elected Nixon and then you wanted him to come
down. So this kind of election has no value. Sometimes you elect and
sometimes you pull down. So what is the value of this election?
Woman reporter: So a leader
should not be elected.
Prabhupada: Elected, but not
by this general public. They have no intelligence. They sometimes elect
a wrong man, and again they try to drag him down. So what is the use of
such election? Because that election is not sober, not mature. If the
election was mature and sober, then there was no need of dragging him
down again.
Woman reporter: We have
talked to scientists who say that the size of the brain has nothing to
do with intelligence. Do you believe that?
Prabhupada: I think that the
scientists do not think like that. They keep the brain of a particular
scientist to study. They keep the heart of a particular noble man. Why
they try to study the heart and the brain if there is no difference?
Nitai: Sometimes they keep
the brain of a great scientist to study because they think that he is
so intelligent, there must be something we can learn from studying the
brain. So if they are thinking like that, then there also must be a
difference between a woman's brain and a man's brain.
Woman reporter: What they say
is that there is difference, but it has nothing to do with the size.
Nitai: Then why do they keep
great scientists' brain to study?
Woman reporter: They keep
many people's brains to study.
Nitai: Especially great
scientists, that they want to see what has made this man so intelligent.
Woman reporter: That's not
necessarily true.
Prabhupada: Then why they
study the brain? What is the purpose of studying brain unless there is
difference? You study different brains. Unless you feel that there is
difference between this brain and that brain, why do you study. What is
the meaning of study?
Woman reporter: To find
differences among men. It's not necessarily differences between men and
woman.
Prabhupada: I don't say man
or woman. But I say you study different brains—why? Unless you think
there is some difference?
Woman reporter: There is
difference.
Prabhupada: Yes. So if there
is difference, then what is the harm if there is difference between man
and woman's brain?
Woman reporter: They say
there isn't.
Prabhupada: They say, but the
fact we have to study. As soon as you study the construction of
different brain, then you must know that there is difference, different
activities.
Woman reporter: In other
words, you do not believe this, what they say.
Prabhupada: Then why do you
study different brain?
Woman reporter: I don't study
them. I'm just telling you what the scientists say.
Prabhupada: So scientists,
the psychologist... As I was a student of psychology and our professor,
a big man, Dr. W. S. Urquhart, he said that "By studying the brains of
man and woman, we have found the highest brain substance found in man,
sixty-four ounce by weight." You may deny. This is the statement of a
big psychologist. You can shake your head, but this is the scientific
words by big psychologist. You can note down his name, Dr. W.S.
Urquhart, professor of psychology in the Scottish Churches College in
1918-20.
Woman reporter: Oh, dear, no
wonder. 1918-1920, that means... O.K. I see now what you're thinking
about. That was many, many years ago.
Prabhupada: So can you give
any proof since then that the woman's... In 1920... She does not take
it?
Nitai: She does not take it.
Somehow they think that the brain is no longer small. If it was small,
then, it is not small today.
Prabhupada: But where is the
proof...
Woman reporter: You do not
believe that there has been advancement of science since 1920?
Nitai: Well, if the brain has
been ascertained as being half the size then why should it change by
now? Should it change?
Woman reporter: Well, do you
think that the Romans weren't as tall as men are today?
Nitai: No, but the... But
then, within fifty years there is not going to be any change in the
brain.
Woman reporter: Not in the
1900's. Why do you use the technology that you use? You didn't have
cars in those days, this television. Things have changed since 1920.
Prabhupada: So what change
has become? Can you give any evidence that woman is more powerful in
brain than the man during these years? Can you give any evidence?
Woman reporter: No, what I'm
saying is that...
Prabhupada: Now, can you give
any evidence that woman has become more powerful than the man during
these fifty years?
Woman reporter: Yes.
Prabhupada: What is that?
Give me some tacit example.
Woman reporter: That she and
I wouldn't be here if women weren't more powerful than they were fifty
years ago.
Harikesa: Now they are
talking louder. [laughter]
Woman reporter: Than you.
Thank you. [woman leaves]
Harikesa: The scientists have
the theory that the brain, the intelligence is measured by creases in
the brain, creases, not by size.
Prabhupada: Not size, but
what is the proof that the brain of woman has increased? Where is the
proof?
Harikesa: They think because
the ego has increased, the brain has also increased.
Prabhupada: Oh, that's nice.
(laughter) That's nice. [laughing] So to become angry means defeat. If
two persons are in argument the man, the one party, he becomes angry,
that means he is defeated. Why one should become angry? It is the
argument, logic. They should continue. And to become angry and to go
away, that means defeat.
Harikesa: They become upset
because they cannot dominate you.
Prabhupada: No, it is not the
question of domination; it is the question of logic. If you do not
agree to logic, then no argument can make progress.
Uttamasloka: Srila
Prabhupada, if one does not agree to logic, does that mean that they
are under the influence of tamo-guna?
Prabhupada: That means he is
animal.
Guest: Under the influence of
who?
Uttamasloka: Tamo-guna.
Harikesa: It's the mode of
ignorance.
Guest: Who?
Harikesa: The mode of
ignorance.
Prabhupada: Logic is meant
for learned man, and uneducated man, they want to force, "Yes, you must
do it." With point of revolver, "You must do it." And educated man,
they argue on logic. That is the difference.
Back
to Top |