World Sankirtan Party
Inside Nam Hatta
Hansadutta World News As It Is
View Site Map
Srila Prabhupada[Posted Oct 10, 2010]

Another scientist denounces global warming as scam

A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami

More Climate Gate fallout - a prominent scientist admits, "It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist"

global warming Telegraph Oct 9, 2010 - PROFESSOR EMERITUS HAL LEWIS

Professor Emiritus Hal Lewis Resigns from American Physical Society

For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

...2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.
go to video


Print this page

The Bhaktivedantas World Sankirtan Party and Inside Nam Hatta are hosted by Hansadutta das, a senior disciple of Srila Prabhupada and trustee of The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. Participate or learn more about World Sankirtan Party.
Nature takes its course
Flawed Predictions A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami

The speculative research work of a so-called scientist or philosopher is always interrupted when he dies, and the laws of nature go on without regard for his work. For billions of years changes take place in the material creation, until at last the whole universe is dissolved and remains in an unmanifested state. more

No agreement between scientists

excerpt from conversation, Los Angeles, April 25, 1973

"You can speak in your own way, I'll speak in my own way" and another fool thinks that both of them are scientists. They do not agree. Still he's scientist. Just see. Cheaters and the cheated. Somebody's cheating and somebody's becoming cheated. The whole society's the combination of cheaters and cheated. That's all. I see both of them, they do not agree. Just like they have rejected religion because two religionists, they do not agree. So why not these rascal scientists? They do not agree. Just see. They are so fool. But still they are after that. Their modern people they have rejected religion because they say that one religionist does not agree with another religionist. So there is no... Skepticism. So why not about the scientists? Just see. Everywhere you will find contradiction.

Back to Top


Sorry, comments are closed for archived pages.
Sri Guru and Gauranga
Sri Guru and Gauranga

Related Articles

Climate change part and parcel of Kali Yuga
Hot and Cold Science
Flawed Predictions
Blind man's bluff
Scientific Method for Extracting Money from Taxpayers
Unholy marriage of scientific advancement and corporate greed
Global warming just so much hot air?

Related Topics

Science & Technology